Is modular design cheaper?

Reduced labor and material costs Thanks to the controlled factory, modular construction significantly reduces costs compared to traditional construction methods. To begin with, this factory method allows for efficient assembly line production of construction components, minimizing the need for skilled labor on site. Modular construction involves manufacturing sections or modules of buildings in a factory-controlled environment before transporting them to the construction site for assembly. Today's leading modular manufacturers have perfected manufacturing processes.

Clearly, one of the biggest benefits of a modular approach is the speed. However, most modular homes offer a fairly wide range per square foot, so it's hard to get a good estimate without going through the process of interviewing all of these different people. It's important to note that the cost-effectiveness of modular construction can vary depending on specific project factors, such as design complexity, site location, and customization requirements. The efficiency, speed and flexibility of modular construction can generate significant savings over the life of the building.

It is possible that those who first discovered modular products on the market twenty or even thirty years ago are operating with the belief that modular construction is a “cheap alternative” to higher-quality traditional buildings. There are many examples of “ready to use”, non-customized modular systems that provide a multitude of homeowners with exactly what they need without modifying the design. While the initial construction costs of a modular building may be comparable to or slightly lower than those of traditional construction, the total cost of ownership often tilts in favor of modular construction. In conclusion, modular construction can offer a more cost-effective solution than traditional construction methods, especially when considering total cost of ownership and long-term benefits. It follows that the moderately adaptive modular architecture (MAM) imposes more restrictions on the owner's designer, forcing him to adapt the spaces to the factory model. Thoroughbred, defined by Websters as “truly outstanding in the environment”, may represent the most commonly used form for modular buildings, since it could be said that it finds the right balance between taking advantage of pre-designed elements and adding the owner's design inspiration and personalized needs.

Even so, it allows designers to manipulate buildings so that they have a unique appearance, but to a lesser extent than the fully adaptive model. Modular construction can reduce project duration by up to 30% compared to in-plant construction. As expected, there is a clear relationship between the savings involved in modular construction and the complexity of the design. With more than 40 years of experience, Triumph Modular has worked with homeowners, architects and engineers to improve the design and performance of temporary and permanent commercial building spaces.

Leave a Comment

All fileds with * are required